Maybe you have a video with correct structured data on a page of your site. One reason is Google may not feel that schema markup type you included in your page will add value to the search or meet their intent. You can use the URL Inspection Tool in Google Search Console to check if a URL is indexed or if not, possible issues.Īs mentioned, just adding schema markup doesn’t guarantee a rich result in Google.
If you are using Yoast for WordPress, make sure you didn’t noindex media (which includes images) in the settings.īottom line: Don’t block your structured data pages to crawlers like Googlebot using robots.txt, noindex, or other access control methods. However, if you noindex images, you won’t have images show up in rich results. Sometimes sites might add meta directive tags such as “noindex” if they don’t want certain content to show up in Google, such as a landing page with thin content that isn’t meant to rank and could hurt other pages. Indexable means that you are OK with Google including your content in the search results (including image results). Other block access to a certain area of a site that doesn’t need to be archivable on a public search engine (like parts of the backend, for example). Why would anyone not allow it? Some may block crawlers from scanning their site if they worry about them slowing down performing, for example. If not, continue to the next section to find out why your structured data may not be showing up in search listings.Ĭontent, including images, must be publicly crawlable and indexable by Google to be eligible for a rich result.Ĭrawlable means that when GoogleBot scans, or crawls, your site for new content, you allow GoogleBot access. If the picture is correctly configured, it will show up in the Preview rendering. This will spin up a mockup of the rich snippet based on the URL or structured data that you provide it. To make sure that your images are rendering properly, check the “Preview” feature of Google’s Rich Results Test Tool. A URL pointing to the video thumbnail image file.Images clearly showing the product (against a white background if possible).Image should be at least 1920px wide (the minimum width is 720px).Images should be at least 1200 pixels wide.Prioritize these over the above general guidelines if you are using these structured data types: Here are some more specific image dimensions. Provide multiple images for each of the following aspect ratios: 16x9, 4x3, and 1x1.Use high-resolution images (minimum of 800K pixels when multiplying width and height).Ratio aspect should not be greater than 3.0.If not instructed otherwise, images should be at least 160x90 pixels and at most 1920x1080 pixels (but see specific exceptions below).You may either provide the whole address as a single string, or provide the separate fields of the address in a nested /PostalAddress.In general, Google recommends most images for rich snippets to meet the following requirements: My guess: Google’s Testing Tool is bugged.Īlthough it says on that Event.location can be either Place or PostalAddress, the google documentation says otherwise.Įvent.location is required and has to be a PlaceĪ nested /Place (or more specific subtype, such as /EventVenue or /PerformingArtsTheater).Į is also required and has to be a PostalAddress Strange, because PostalAddress can’t have an address property, as I’ve explained in an answer to a similar question on Stack Overflow. Now checking this markup, Google’s Testing Tool will report different errors for PostalAddress:Īdding a name to the PostalAddress item fixes the last two errors, so it leaves you with this strange error: " address: missing and required". If I correctly interpret your intentions, it should look like this:
0 kommentar(er)
